September 26, 2012

Ahmadinejad is Henry Winkler! Let's Avert War, Shall We?



H.E. Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of the Islamic Republic of Iran is a fraudulent character played by Henry Winkler. !!!!


AhmadineFRAUD with Mahmoud EXPOSED




And Winkler also plays John McCain, that hawkish senator bent on bombing Iran.  Regarding military action against Iran, McCain has said, 
"There's a whole lot of things we can do before we seriously consider the military option," but clarifying, "I still say there's only one thing worse than military action against Iran and that is a nuclear-armed Iran."
Playing both sides of the conflict.  Nicely done, you criminals.  This is crystal clear evidence that we have been deceived.  Many of us knew that the allegations against Iran were not well-supported to say the least, and a spike in oil prices is beneficial to the rulers of Iran just as much to the oil cartels.  

But this is akin to a stab in the back.  Here is this charlatan, Ahmadinejad, played by Winkler, antagonizing the pro-war followers in the West with what seemed like reasonable statements  to most Western moderates, but always laced with anti-Israeli and anti-American sentiments.  Just enough venom to slightly infuriate the misinformed Western masses and make himself out to be a villain, and just enough sycophantic and pro-Islamic verbal nuances to ease the Muslim world into generating hatred for the West.

Slicker than the oil the leaders of Iran bathe in.

Earlier today, Canadian diplomats walked out on the Iranian president's speech to the UN General Assembly after a Foreign Affairs spokesman denounced Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's "hateful, anti-Western, anti-Semitic views." 



What other purpose is a speech like this intended for but to incite military action on both sides?  It is chock full of generalizations stating obvious and well-known observations regarding the economic, cultural, political and environmental degradation of our planet, all the while his tyrannical government is raking in the oil money and offering no solutions.


Instead, let's now observe how the criminals in our world's governments use staged events like this speech and potentially reported "military action" in the Strait of Hormuz to further their agenda of war and destruction.

Knowing what you know now, let's all abstain from partaking in this madness...

The only real New World Order is one without war and needless suffering...

38 comments:

  1. there will be war. TB joshua prophezied on it. the protocols write about it. pikes letter to mazzini clearly states it. "the zionists will fight against the muslims to the point of complete spiritual, material, physical exhaustion. then we will unleash the nihilists and finally bring our luciferian doctrine into broad daylight".

    look at all the other arab leaders in the world. ALL of them i mean ALL are krypto jews without exception. that goes for spiritual leaders as well as politics.

    by the way look at the video of winkler signing autographs on hollywood. that guy has really lost it IMHO. also watch his busy movie career on IMDB: he´s probly so used to playing roles he has no "real" character left in him. the ideal person for someone like ahmadinejad.

    both men are 168cm tall.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The protocols of the Elders of Zion are similar to the average Alex Jones presentation: Some truth and fiction mixed together with an alarmist slant, and deliberately leaked. People who see the world is run by a jewish conspiracy, can find evidence in the Protocols to support this view. Others who find these claims nonsensical can also point to passages to deride it as an anti-semeitic conspiracy theory. Same ploy used with Ahmadinejad dispensing this information. These gambits are only effective if people do not see it is a bunch of actors slinging this material. Once they are exposed or have the danger of being exposed they lose much of their nerve. It's one thing to clamor for war using a fake character, but as we get closer to their real names they get nervous. People who lost family members serving could encounter them in normal life, and want to mess them up.

      Delete
    2. YES A MESS IT IS , we must demand our military arrest all of these actors ,they all need to be tried, jfk,carter, marylin monroe,carter,onassis,all one in the same, this is HUGE !!!! SPREAD THE WORD, they will fake an alien invasion in 1 month ,,probably 3-22-13,,they keep putting that # in our faces at the super bowl, yesterday the time the pope resigned, 322pm, i mean ,we have to stop these bastards before they destroy the world ,, you know they will do anything to get their way, we need to unite the world & fix this NOW, we cannot wait any longer , Charlie Sheen is the Governor of CT ??/WHAT THE F$%^&

      Delete
  2. this is the most important story that ed charaini has posted yet!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The ear analysis is accurate and conclusive. The three characters of Winkler, Ahmadinejad and McCain are surely one and the same. The evidence is still coming in that our whole history is bunk and needs to be rewritten. What a mess!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. what a mess when people have to post anonymous and cant even tell who they are.

      Delete
  4. delinquentwords... You hit the nail on the head. Couldn't have said it better myself. The Protocols were leaked deliberately. For the very reasons you contended.

    More great work, Ed! Thank you again.

    ReplyDelete
  5. goys check out steven harper MP of canada and german politician Oscar Lafontaine. same profile similar ear. are they father+son ? or is lafontaine also an older character portrayed by a younger man ? hes been in german politics for ages, at least 20 yrs or more. how can they do this for so long they must be schizophrenic. or father+son again ? i dunno.

    ReplyDelete
  6. everything will come to light one day

    ReplyDelete
  7. Look for inconsistencies in old age stippling If you suspect an actor is playing an older character. Wrinkling will be different every time its applied. Of course they can photograph numerous events after one make-up session. So you may have to examine many photos.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Is it possible, they are just trying to cover up the cloning programs?

    http://www.2012unlimited.net/Robotoids.html

    Jay Leno I believe he may be left handed. So many of them in high places.
    Like Bill Gates, Ronald Regan, Bill Clinton, Bush SR, Obama...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Did a signature comparison with this winkler character and Shahrukh Khan of Bollywood cinema. Holy freak. Bingo!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Left ear is different shape I think... but that would be extremely shocking...

      Delete
    2. Don't know about Shahrukh Khan (though the Cohen allusion is tell-tale here), but I'll eat my hat AND be damned if "so-sexy-it-hurts Saif Ali Khan" - yet another flagship representative of the clan - isn't old Toneee boy!

      Good range of pics here: http://allbollywoodstarz.blogspot.de/2012/08/saif-ali-khan-profile-and-new-images.html

      What's also extremely suspicious about the Bollywood Bunch is their Swiss connections.

      Delete
  10. DieFreiwirtin, thanks I'll check the pics. Indeed it is shocking and outing so called King Khan, ah woah, how would they go about changing/polishing off that character? Tee Hee. Always knew there was something very suspicious/wrong with Bollywood, what a thrill my hunches were correct. Don't you think that Kareena Kapoor is Paris Hilton and Preity Zinta is that wolf, Drew Barrymore? One good thing about all this, it provides for some great laughs from these silly goofs.

    Sentient

    ReplyDelete
  11. Also that deceitful witch Drew Barrymore is very much Aishwarya Rai of Bollywood also her husband Abhishek Bachan seems to be none other than Tony Freekberg/Will Kopelman?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Drew Barrymore=Aishwarya Rai? Abhishek Bachan=Tony Greenberg/Will Kopelman? Now who the freak is Big Bachan? Man are these people pathetic or what?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Tom Hanks=Amir Khan?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Antonio Banderas=John Abraham?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yeah, after comparing, Abhishek Bachan seems very much to be Phony Greenberg and The Big Bachan=Ricardo Montalban.

    ReplyDelete
  16. ok on my blog i outed drew barrymore as aishwara rai, and tony our most frequent customer as zaif khan and also another bollywood heavyhitter abishak bachchan. (i neve rheard before of any of them) so to transfer from holly to bolly isnt a biggie for them. once they have mastered the language halfway they just follow the same procedures as in LA, learning lines, reading scripts, sitting still for the makeup artist, and then "boom" go bananas for the camera. and it works.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, but what about Dennis Rodman=Tommy Lee? Look forward to that one, but maybe not. Getting bored at looking/unveiling these ridiculously/silly vile creatures.

      Delete
    2. Okay, I'll have to rethink the Shah Rukh Khan=Winkler. Something was still nagging me and I do now think, it's quite possible, Shah Rukh Khan = Brad Pitt?

      Delete
    3. Shah Rukh Khan=Brad Pitt? Bipasha Basu=Kim Kardashian?

      Delete
    4. How come you didn't post my comments from yesterday? I'll take it you're rather busy.

      Delete
    5. Sentient - Don't know why but the actor Gael Garcia Bernal popped into my head when I looked at Shah Rukh Khan. On an unrelated note, I was watching the pretend US election last night and Grover Norquist sounds exactly like Dick Morris. This is like shooting fish in a barrel.

      Delete
    6. Goin' down the rabbit hole but does Shah Rukh Khan = Gael Garcia Bernal = Macaulay Culkin?

      Delete
  17. Is Lara Dutta=Bipasha Basu? Kareena Kapoor=Paris Hilton? Ah ha, I love it! It's so easy, but I won't give away, another mistake they keep making!!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yep, just did a signature comparison on Kapoor/Hilton. Seems like a match. Never mind the signature. The skank feeling my senses picked was evidently enough. Thanks chiarini and Butzer (Butt, hmmmm?) for proving what my eyes and senses was telling me all along!!


    Time to take a nice long shower, scrub their muck off and then we go play.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Ann Margaret = Helen(Bollywood Dancer)= Helen Mirren? Most definitely: Helen(Bollywood)=Helen Mirren! Oh skikes!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Yep just did a comparison of Helen Mirren's Husband and Helen of Bollywood's husband=Salim Khan. Match.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Alright, Bipasha Basu=Kim Kardashian? Me tinks so. Sheeesh.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Thanks Butzer, hmmmmm, for posting. How about:

    Halle Berry=Manuela Testolini=Freida Pinto(Slumdog Millionaire)?
    Eric Benet=Prince?
    Amitabh Bachan=Ricardo Montalban?



    Another thing that becomes apparent, is how easily they can make white people appear as other races. Are Hendrix and any of them really Nubians/Black? Hmmmm... Yes, the more I look into this, I seriously don't think.

    Wow, talk about revenge of the "Descendants of the African Albinos/Albino Saxons. Hmmmm....

    Okay. Mystery solved, this case closed. Much more important things to figure enjoy. But will dip in every so often.

    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Yes, Shah Rukh Khan may very well = Brad Pitt. Ka jol=Angelina Jol ie.

    http://img.bollycurry.com/wallpapers/1024x768/29696-kajol-devgan.jpg

    Yes, the wretch looks very tired here, but notice how she puts the hair behind the left ear in both pics:


    http://static.screenindia.com/m-images/2012-05-18/M_Id_289078_Angelina_Jolie.jpg


    ReplyDelete
  24. Malcolm X=Louis Farrakhan?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Here is one that is pretty much undeniable... Baghdad Bob from the start of the Iraq War (Saddam's Propaganda Minister), is Leon Panetta. Too easy.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The more I look at it, I do believe that Shah Rukh Khan could very well be Brad Pitt in disguise.

    ReplyDelete
  27. and the first supreme leader of iran was connery

    ReplyDelete